|   
		   | 
		
		Jiddu 
		Krishnamurti on true Prayer and Meditation
		Question: Has prayer no validity, or is true prayer 
		the same as meditation? 
		Jiddu Krishnamurti : Prayer and the thing that you 
		call  meditation are acts of volition. Are they not? We 
		deliberately sit down to meditate, we take a certain posture, 
		concentrate in order to understand. We pray because we suffer. Behind 
		prayer and the ways of meditation that we know, there is an act of 
		volition, an act of will. 
		 
		When you pray, obviously it is an act of will; you want, you beg, you 
		ask; as a result of your confusion, misery, suffering, you ask some one 
		to give you knowledge, comfort; and you do have comfort. The asker 
		generally receives what he asks for; but what he receives may not be the 
		truth, and generally it is not the truth. You cannot come to truth as a 
		beggar. 
		 
		Truth must come to you; then only you see the truth, not by asking. But 
		we are beggars, we everlastingly seek comfort, we seek some kind of 
		state in which we will never be disturbed; we ask for that, and we will 
		have the reward; but the reward is death, stagnation. 
		 
		Don't you know the people who demand peace? They have peace, but their 
		peace is isolation and they keep on repeating the same phrases which 
		they memorize. The mind makes them quiet. It is like a stagnant pool 
		with moss, the words are covered with the activities of the mind. The 
		mind is made dull. Surely, that is not meditation. 
		 
		Meditation is something totally different, is it not? Please follow what 
		I am saying and see the truth of meditation. To meditate, there must be 
		the understanding of the mediator; that is the first requirement - not 
		how to meditate; because, how to meditate only develops concentration 
		which is exclusion. You may be absorbed in your exclusion, but that is 
		not meditation. 
		 
		
		Meditation is the process of 
		self-knowledge which is the knowledge of the mediator - not the 
		higher mediator who is meditating, not the higher self which is 
		searching. To think about the higher self is not meditation. 
		
		 
		Meditation is to be aware of the activities of the mind - the mind as 
		the mediator, how the mind divides itself as the mediator and the 
		meditation, how the mind divides itself as the thinker and the thought, 
		the thinker dominating thought, controlling thought, shaping thought. 
		 
		So in all of us, there is the thinker separate from the thought; the 
		thinker has become the higher Self, the nobler self, the Atman, or what 
		you will; but it is still the mind divided as the thinker and the 
		thought. The mind seeing thought in flux, impermanent, creates the 
		thinker as the permanent, as the Atman which is permanent, absolute and 
		endless. 
		 
		The moment the mind has created the higher self, the Atman, that higher 
		self is still of time; it is still within the field of memory; it is an 
		invention of the mind, it is an illusion created by the mind for a 
		purpose. That is a psychological fact, whether you like it or not; you 
		may resist it, you may say that it is all modern nonsense, that what is 
		said in the Upanishads, in the Gita, is contrary to what I am saying. 
		But if you really examine closely and are not afraid and do not resist, 
		you will see that there is only thinking which creates the thinker, not 
		the thinker first and thinking afterwards. 
		 
		You do not think you are nobody. Because your thoughts are conditioned, 
		because you think as a Hindu, you consider yourself to be a separate 
		mind, a separate state in which there is the thinker. As long as there 
		is an experiencer experiencing, there can be no true meditation. But the 
		discovery that the experiencer is the experience, is meditation. 
		 
		Can one discover for oneself - not according to what 
		Shankara or 
		Buddha 
		has said - can one see the truth that the experiencer and the experience 
		are one, that the thought and the thinker are integral? I can only 
		discover it by the process of meditation - which is, to understand what 
		is actually taking place, to observe the ways of my mind. That is not a 
		trick, a thing to be learnt, that the experiencer and the experience are 
		one. 
		 
		You cannot glibly repeat it, it means nothing. But the moment I see, 
		through meditation, the truth of that, then meditation begins: then 
		meditation is no posture for an hour but it is a state which continues 
		throughout the day; because, the mind is in a state of awareness, not as 
		the experiencer experiencing - therefore judging, weighing, clearing, 
		evaluating - because, after all, every experience makes the experiencer, 
		every thought makes the thinker, puts the thinker together. 
		 
		Look what happens when you have an experience of any kind, your mind 
		immediately registers it, remembers; the remembering of it is the 
		creation of the experiencer, because then the experiencer says I must 
		have more of it or the less of it. Watch your own minds and see how any 
		experience creates the thinker, the rememberer, and then the thinker, 
		the experiencer, says `There must be more', and so it perpetuates 
		itself. It is the process of time. 
		 
		The mind is everlastingly seeking an experience - a richer, wider, 
		nobler, deeper, purer experience - and so it receives: and the very 
		reception is the creation of the chains that bind humanity. Memory is 
		`the me' which is the experiencer. So when I, as the experiencer, seek 
		God, when I seek truth, which I shall know, from which I shall receive 
		help, my mind moves from the known to the known, from time to time; and 
		this process is what you call meditation. But it is an ugly practice, it 
		is not meditation at all, it is merely the perpetuation of the self in a 
		different way. There is no meditation in the deeper sense of the word, 
		when there are an experiencer and the experience. 
		 
		There must be the cessation of 
		the experiencer and the experience, the things which the experiencer 
		recollects, recognises - which means, there must be a state in 
		which there is no recognition; which means, dying to every experience as 
		it comes and not creating the experiencer. If you really listen and see 
		the truth or falseness of it, you will know what meditation is - not how 
		one is to meditate, but to see the full significance of what meditation 
		is. 
		 
		After all, virtue is order. What you are, so you must be. Real virtue is 
		a clean thing, but it is not an end in itself. What you put in the room 
		is more important, not how clean your room is. So the cultivation of the 
		mind or the building up of virtue is not important; that is not the 
		emptying of the mind necessary to receive that which is eternal. The 
		mind must be empty to receive that. 
		 
		That which is measureless can only come into being, you cannot invite 
		it, it will only come into being when the mind no longer demands, is no 
		longer praying, asking, begging when the mind is free, free from 
		thought. The ending of thought is the way of meditation. There must be 
		freedom from the known for the unknown to be. This is meditation, and 
		this cannot come through any trick, through any practice. 
		
		Practice, discipline, 
		suppression, denial, sacrifice only strengthen the experiencer, they 
		give him power to control himself; but that power destroys. So it 
		is only when the mind has neither the experiencer nor the experience, 
		that there is that bliss which is, which cannot be sought, which comes 
		into being when the mind is silent and free.  
		 
 
		^Top                                                          
		Back to Krishnamurti Meditation  | 
		
		  
		 
  |